GI Jane Finally Gets Her Chance

I suppose it’s an indication of how jaded I’ve become at each new Obama initiative that I barely turned my head to the television when the news blared that outgoing Secretary of Defense Panetta announced that combat positions would now be open to women.

I get it.  Women are “already on the front lines.”  The face of warfare has changed, and after over a decade of war, we’ve been fighting without a distinctive front.  Women have been in the line of fire from snipers and IED’s from the beginning.  All this change in policy is amounts to a de facto acknowledgement of what has been going on in Iraq and Afghanistan for years.

But still…

I should preface this by saying that during my many years in the military, I served with women in all matter of positions, both as subordinates and supervisors, and there was no job in the units I served in that a woman couldn’t do.  But those units were not combat arms units.

It’s one thing to be in a war zone, and it’s another to open up combat arms positions to women.  Those jobs are extremely physically demanding.  How physically demanding?  Demanding enough that two female officers who attempted to go through the Marine Corps Infantry Course both dropped out.  It’s no shame to drop out of a course like that.  It’s demanding enough that the course loses 25% of its male candidates, but it doesn’t bode well as a proof of concept that women are capable of making through that course and others like it.  If this was a project that would work on the merits we would have seen women in the NFL years ago.

The physical realities of maintaining a high performance in a combat zone, were well detailed in a much spoken about article in the Marine Corps Gazette last July by Marine Corps Captain Katie Petronio.  The article, titled “Get Over It!  We Are Not Created Equal,” got the ball rolling in the military.  The article, which I highly recommend, is Captain Petronio’s personal experience while deployed in Afghanistan, and the physically debilitating toll that the experience took on her body.  Her argument is that the cost to the services of dealing with the long term physical deterioration of females put in those grueling situations isn’t cost effective or the best use of resources.

And she’s just talking about women who can make the physical standards.  I’m more worried about the women who will have the standards adjusted to allow them to make it.  Yes I know, Panetta and JCS Chairman Dempsey said that wouldn’t happen, but I just don’t believe it.  Contrary to common opinion, The Department of Defense isn’t a conservative organization.  Following  O’Sullivan’s Law (any organization that is not explicitly conservative will become liberal over time), the military is about as liberal in direction as the private company I work for, with its constant profiles on diversity and emails celebrated it’s perfect score by the Human Rights Campaign on LGBT issues.  The Pentagon would like to get a perfect score on LGBT issues too, but first you have to walk, not run, so they are going for gender equity.

Currently the services are reevaluating their Physical Fitness Standards as well as the physical fitness standards for each Military Occupational Specialty to justify what standards should be required for each military job.  I’m pretty sure the standards will be tweaked until the Pentagon can get what they consider the right number of women into combat arms jobs.

Think that I’m wrong and the Pentagon would never purposefully degrade the nation’s military capabilities for some fuzzy affirmative action goal?

In November 2009, I wrote about the aftermath of the terrorist attack at Ft.  Hood committed by MAJ Hasan.  At the time, Army Chief of Staff General George Casy said on Meet The Press, “Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” 

So yes, an Army General is saying that it’s better that 13 soldiers were killed then trying to scrutinize terrorists in the ranks.  Such an organization will make sure that their shiny new women-in-combat policy succeeds.  And they won’t worry about combat readiness or people’s lives to make sure it does.  Any Colonel who dares say publicly otherwise will never see General.

Sometimes the military’s can do spirit can make incredible things happen.  Sometimes it can make stupid things happen.  I’m pretty sure I know in the years ahead which one this is.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “GI Jane Finally Gets Her Chance

  1. Needless to say, it’ll be mostly female officers who volunteer for combat arms specialties. This will create a disparity that will be seen as evidence of discrimination. That issue will be addressed with the usual affirmative action measures. Women will be encouraged (or forced) to go into combat arms. Standards will be lowered in order to prevent further disparities.

    On top of all that, complaints of sexual harassment and sexual assault will increase. The military will react with the iron-fisted political correctness that is all too familiar to those of us who served in the port-Cold War era.

    These factors will combine to discourage many of the men who are best suited to combat arms jobs from staying in the military. They’ll be pushed out the door by a military that is happy to be rid of these “dinosaurs.” And the “rough men” who stand read to do violence on our behalf will be replaced by a kinder, gentler, “gender-integrated” force who stand ready to… Okay, I have no idea what they’ll be capable of. But they won’t be better able to close with and kill the enemy than the force that preceded them. But I don’t think it will matter much in the near term, as I’m certain that Obama plans to gut the military anyway.

    Like

  2. Heh! You have a point. It may not matter what social engineering schemes the DoD goes for if they are also choosing to go for a hollow force. But I’m pretty sure they will alter the standards in order to make it work. I don’t think a female Olympic athlete could get through current Ranger training, let along Delta or Seal training. Very few could get through 11B OSUT. But the Pentagon will make sure they get the right numbers through somehow.

    Like

  3. I am not in favor of putting women in positions they cannot meet the current standards. But if they can, they deserve a shot. I am concerned about the alarming number of sexual attacks our female service members are suffering. They are fighting a war and having to watch their backs at the same time. They deserve the respect and support from their fellow service members. They should not live in fear. My own daughter suffers a life of frost bite, a retaliation by a vengeful sgt. for trying to get a fellow female soldier justice for her suffering.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s