Last week is the first time in President Obama’s presidency that the hypocrisy and double standards of the media has finally been realized by that same media. It’s as if they are awakening from a long, four year nap. President Obama’s DCI nominee John Brennan’s testimony last week brought public the administration’s policy on targeted drone killings. As Brennan floundered trying to explain the policy, he was interrupted countless times by the far left anti war group Code Pink, which had previously been in a state of suspended animation since January 20, 2009.
On Morning Joe, Kelly O’Donnell noted how differently this is being viewed then if this were a Dick Cheney policy. In fact, with Joe gone for that segment, the table was 100% liberal, and even simple Mika Brzezinski seemed to realize that people’s reactions, including hers, to the issue of drones targeting American citizens, was based more on your allegiance to a Presidential administration than to the policy itself. Only Obama sycophant Donnie Deutsch supported the President by supporting the administration’s policy of killing Americans.
Eugene Robinson’s column last Thursday perfectly encapsulated the confusion the left is dealing with:
If George W. Bush had told us that the “war on terror” gave him the right to execute a U.S. citizen overseas with a missile fired from a drone aircraft, without due process or judicial review, I’d have gone ballistic. It makes no difference that the president making this chilling claim is Barack Obama. What’s wrong is wrong.
Of course Robinson isn’t going ballistic over Obama’s policy. But he at least recognizes that in theory, he should.
It’s not a new issue. American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki, the Iman behind the Ft. Hood attack, was targeted and killed by a drone attack in 2011. I shed no tears over his death. In fact, I’m glad he’s dead. I personally have no problem with drone warfare. It’s another tool in the toolbox and if it makes key Al-Qaeda leaders nervous and looking over their shoulder, so much the better.
But specifically targeting Americans is a different story. There are plenty of situations in which an American forfeits normal due process; put on a Confederate or Wehrmacht uniform, and it’s open season on you on the battlefield. Or hanging around a legitimate military target, whether it’s a terrorist training camp or terrorist leader is rolling the dice. But that’s not the same as an American citizen being targeted for assassination by name off a target list that the President personally picks, without any sort of due process. And in spite of White House assurances, I rather doubt it’s legal.
The fact that al-Awlaki was an American citizen was barely mentioned as a potential legal issue in the MSM at the time of his killing. But now the President is safely re-elected some liberals and the media are finally opening their eyes that with President Obama, they got a war on terror strategy very similar to the one they thought they voted out when Bush left office. Of course, I’ve had my eyes open on Obama’s policy for a while and have given the President his props when I thought he deserved them, but for the left, which though they were voting out Gitmo, drone strikes, ”warrantless wiretapping,” and the Patriot Act ending up getting… Gitmo, drone strikes,”warrantless wiretapping,” and the Patriot Act.
And now, targeted assassination of Americans.
The real question is whether this a momentary blip, and the left and the media will gently fall back asleep as the elections of 2014 and 2016 get nearer, or has Obama really gone too far, and the left and the media will have to take a stand in opposition in principle?
I’m guessing heavy doses of Ambien and off to dreamland again!