This is just a collection of interesting reading I’ve come across in the past few days. They’re not really related to Memorial Day.
This from The Atlantic, and my main surprise is that The Atlantic ran something like this before Salon did. Written by Atlantic columnist Ta-Nehisi Coates, the title doesn’t match the article, which instead is about the persistent housing and mortgage discrimination that sabotaged dreams of African American home ownership and achieving the middle class throughout the 20th Century. As a history, the article is extremely well done, but has what to do with reparations exactly? My gut feeling is that this is a well researched piece that Coates had been working on for a while, and the editors decided to run with the title and the tacked on conclusion about reparations. My guess is it’s after a call from either the White House, DNC, or whoever is planning election strategy for Democrats for this year. In case there was any doubt, in the same way that the Democratic strategy for the 2012 election was the “Republican War on Women,” 2014 will be the year of the “Republican War on Blacks.” In order to generate African American turnout, could this be the year that the Democratic Party begins supporting some sort of reparations?
Charles Murray is his usual controversial self, but he makes some good points with:
Murray argues that the value of a 4 year college degree, the trusty BA, has dropped over the years as more people over the years as more people have them. In 2014, does it make sense to tell every High School student who can fog an SAT to go to college, even if you are going for non descript social science or liberal arts field? And he brings up a really penetrating question, why does it take 4 academic school years to get a BA no matter what is taught?
I’m not into what the kids call tumbler, but I came across this link and it’s eye opening.
This tumbler however, compares street photos of Detroit from 2009 to 2013. The rapid deterioration of the property is amazing. Note to Walking Dead producers: If you want to see how houses and businesses really look after the apocalypse, this will give you the comparative tools to build realistic sets.
No collection of links could be complete without one from Mark Steyn. The problem is, as always, which one to pick?
The article compares National Review writer Dinesh D’Souza’s conviction for breaking campaign finance laws, with the Obama campaign disengaging their security for credit card transactions for 2008 and 2012 so anyone, from Adolph Hitler to Mickey Mouse could donate to the Obama campaign, and from anywhere in the world (Hitler donated from “The Reichstag, Germany”). All a violation of campaign laws of course, but not even an investigation by the FEC. It was an issue that was well covered in the conservative blogosphere but not at all interesting to the MSM. This is part of a long term issue Steyn has been discussing of the organs of government being corrupted to serve the ruling party.
Since it is Memorial Day after all, on a military related note:
The Army has officially selected its new camouflage pattern, called Scorpion, to replace its current UCP gray pajamas pattern, the last one I wore before retiring. It’s very close to, but not quite similar to the Multicams that have been worn for Afghanistan deployment for the past few years. Why not just multicams? If I knew the answer to that, I might be smart enough to know why switching from desert camo pattern of the old Battle Dress Uniform to gray greenish digital camo would make sense for the desert. All I know is that the travesties of US Army camouflage uniforms over the last 12 years deserve a much longer treatment.