Watching the breaking news of the terrible terrorist attack in Nice, during Bastille Day celebrations, I felt a morbid interest as the casualty count marched upward. After the initial shock on hearing of the news of the attacks however, I skipped over the part about mourning a senseless tragedy, or whatever the current buzzwords are. As I described last November after the Paris Attacks, I’m over it. Europe would rather have regular terrorist attacks than recognize why they have regular terrorist attacks. No, my interest was in the causality numbers, 30, 40. 70, and then finally it went over 80.
“I win.” And I say that with no satisfaction.
On January 1st I listed these following predictions for 2016 on a forum:
The Syrian government will be in a better position than today against the IS and the other rebels, thanks to Russian help. Also Assad will still be in power.
There will be another terrorist attack in the US resulting in the deaths of at least 10 people.
Oil will be back over $40 bucks a barrel.
Trump gets the Republican nomination.
Hillary will NOT be indicted.
There will be another terrorist attack in France resulting in the deaths of at least 80 people.
So with the Bastille Day attack, the last open prediction I had came true, and we’re only half way through the year. Of course you could argue that the year is still not over and something could still happen to Assad’s government, or there could be a convention coup next week to put Jeb! Back on the Iron Throne, but if I had to call it now, I would say every prediction I made almost 7 months ago was right.
I don’t think this makes me a super forecaster, like the ones being sought for the Good Judgment Project, a crowd sourcing website for predictions. But amateurs often beat the experts on these kinds of things. My accurate prediction that the Supreme Court would uphold Obamacare had nothing to do with my (limited) legal knowledge, or the disastrous oral arguments, even though multiple “experts” declared Obamacare dead after the Solicitor General stumbled and fumbled his way through them. My view was more holistic, and simpler: The left leaning judges will always vote left, regardless of the law or the Constitution. With the right leaning judges, it’s more of a crapshoot. They actually peek at the Constitution and case history. And as Judge Roberts demonstrated, they can be intimidated by media pressure. That’s why the Burwell case on the Obamacare State Exchanges was easy to predict. No knowledge of the law was required, only the knowledge that the right leaning judges could crumble under media pressure.
And as for gay marriage, that was about the easiest prediction I’ve ever made. Who didn’t know that as soon as it hit the Supreme Court, they would find a way to make sure love is love?
I applied the same holistic thinking to Presidential elections. I called the 2012 election for Obama by the end of summer, and after the 2014 midterms, which was a huge Republican success; I went head and predicted that Republicans would lose both the Senate and the Presidency in 2016. Again, I took a holistic approach. I didn’t think I needed to know each county’s voting history, aka Michael Barone. I just knew that overall demographic trends, media bias, and the increased tribalism of American politics favored the Democrats.
But I couldn’t anticipate Black Swan Events, and that very much describes Donald Trump’s impact on the 2016 election. Minus Trump, this election would have gone pretty much as I had predicted it would in 2014, one of the other 16 primary candidates would have won the nomination, they would have run an honorable campaign, and would give what everyone would later acknowledge as one of their best speeches when they conceded on election night. But Trump was a wildcard not only in showing how Republicans could beat the media’s political correctness game, but he pushed the Overton Window on Immigration and single handedly threw out one of the Republican Party’s golden platform planks on trade. By doing so, he changed the calculus on which votes he might attract.
So when it comes to predicting this year’s race…I’m out. I think Trump could win if his campaign confiscates his twitter account, keeps him on a steady diet of prepared speeches, and Muslims continue to be Muslim. However all of the default conditions that make me think the Democrats have a natural advantage in Presidential years are still in play. If nothing else, this particular black swan has made this the most interesting Presidential race in my lifetime, and who could have predicted that?